That is extra a rant than anything else, and a bit faraway from the discussion of hiking, and hiking clothes for girls. Yes I might love to start out a clothing company of my own which might also have it’s own “social mission” so to speak. Clothes firms goals are being profitable by concentrating on women. In the process nearly all of clothing corporations make the world worse for women. It is as if it is an agenda towards girls. Most likely most women’s kinds are designed and conceptualized by males from the drawing board to the ultimate sewing collectively of the apparel item. The few ladies who're in the women’s clothing design industry apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a trend toward better clothes designs for women who need practicality, dignity and function in their clothes. And that's the place the dilemma comes in for plenty of ladies who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Girls who simply want functional, snug clothes are actually underrepresented . Sure, lots of people would say “Not so. Since a variety of low-rise or pores and skin-tight jeans, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-short skirts are the sort of clothes that in all probability the vast majority of women purchase (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothes) , then it means these are the styles that will proceed to be manufactured and furthermore these sorts of “feminine styles” will make their manner into all sorts of women’s clothes, even the ones that are purported to be for perform not vogue. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and so forth. It's not the only clothes firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates style into perform. It brings us again to where we began. As fairly a number of ladies who posted right here on “Hiking Lady” have stated, they resort to men’s clothing for higher fit, higher consolation, better freedom of motion and higher durability. I'd say that usually unisex sizing is the perfect option to go together with some options that might help accommodate individuals who may need a bit more hip or belly (each women and men). The majority of women’s “active wear” simply don’t have it. ’s clothing. Men’s sizes are bigger even in the case of “small” sizes for males. I doubt this is impossible. Normally, ladies can match into men’s clothes this way. The scrubs have been provided by the ability. I just lately was working in a analysis facility and was required to wear scrubs. I informed her that relating to scrubs, a measurement small pant doesn't fit me and it's strange as a result of most small-dimension men’s pants match me. The availability individual mentioned she thought a dimension small would fit me. The supply particular person mentioned that it's because ladies have hips and men don’t. I instructed her that evidently plenty of small-sized males would find it laborious to slot in most small-sized scrubs too. What a lot of people seem to forget is that some males do have pretty-outstanding hips and the vast majority of men’s clothes are meant for men with completely straight hips. In truth when males get older, in their 40s they very often develop bigger hips. Years ago, I recall a radio commercial for a special kind of Levis jeans which were meant for older males and it was said that the features had extra room in the hip and thigh. Yet men have a greater deal on the subject of clothes. Women’s clothes is all the time made to include trend slightly than function. EMS and REI and Sierra Buying and selling Post, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Information, and numerous different such stores, or online shops have a few of the higher forms of clothing meant for hiking and other out of doors activities. Manufacturers equivalent to Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and varied others. These brands tend to have the best possible materials, and the most effective features. They've the most effective mix of fabrics so as to be lightweight as potential for hot days and which can protect in cold days with out numerous bulk. They are inclined to have SPF built in to protect the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to make use of a big size to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the part of the jacket that was beneath the waist bellowed out and just was uncomfortable to wear and simply had a very awkward look to it. Yet, I have seen such absurdly-lower jackets for women by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to reinforce the female type while being “useful” for out of doors exercise, or that's what the designers had in mind and yet I have to surprise what they were considering by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and limiting once i moved. I don’t know the way it ever obtained manufactured and probably thousands had been made and it gave the impression to be a waste of time and materials and it seemed as if the “quality management people” missed some main design flaws. I want I wrote down the fashion number in order that perhaps I might find a hyperlink to it in the internet and maybe you all can see for your self. There are different women’s active wear that might not be as excessive however which still have sufficient lack of function so that most energetic women just can not use them. The Gap and Old Navy will not be particularly for energetic wear but they have small line of such clothes. I believe that they are terrible in materials and design. The Gap, Outdated Navy, Modell’s, Target, K-Mart and other such shops, essentially solely have clothes made of cotton ( with just a few exceptions). Modell’s is purported to be a “sports store” but it surely carries train clothes for ladies which is made by Nike, Addidas (and so forth) and although these are nicely-recognized brand names, I discover that they really put an excessive amount of trend into clothing on the expense of perform. They went out of enterprise years in the past however in addition they had clothing for women that I discovered to be impractically designed. In New York Metropolis where I stay there's one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-well-identified retailer in decrease Manhattan which sells all kinds of outdoor/camping/hiking equipment and clothes. There was a store in NYC known as Herman’s and one other referred to as Robbin’s. Removed from it. I've seen women in these shops speaking to gross sales associates and saying that they've looked in every single place for extra practical designs . There is a company that quite a lot of you in all probability have heard of called “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s active wear. There are numerous Modell’s and one Sports activities Authority, and some Outdated Navy’s and It would seem that there are loads of stores that might have one thing for every woman. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The vast majority of their types are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” while playing sports activities or engaging in rugged out of doors activities. Why do I at all times notice that the clothes that come the closest to being practical and rugged and practical are those which are discontinued and changed by people who aren’t? Their women’s bathing suits are actually useless. They're meant for girls who've perfect figures , even who're skilled models and the bathing suits are sexist for my part. They could proceed a certain type for several seasons or they might substitute the style and never revive it. Why should any bathing swimsuit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the highest be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain kinds of designs called “Grab and Go” which means that the clothes are so practically designed which you could simply grab them, throw them on, and stroll out the door to train or do the rest. Are you going to go swimming or browsing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I wish that it was as marketed to be. All through my life I have gone from retailer to store during sure times of the year on the lookout for one of the best rugged and functional clothes for winter or summer season. It's always exhausting to search out anything close to what I want. It typically goes for sneakers and slippers and other footwear too. I typically must take no matter comes closest and that is usually within the men’s part. There are designs which I'll go to my grave scratching my head over relating to why they were made the best way they have been.. I as soon as found some comfy slip-ons made by Teva. However the absurd thing was that the soles have been designed with fairly-deep grooves that have been very carefully spaced they usually have been all over the only real . Simply why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They're the principle piece of clothes that will probably be touching the bottom and going via all sorts of disgusting stuff. I have had a fantasy of designing sneakers which are meant to be cleaned and are simple to clean. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To allow climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it doesn't work on any sort of foot put on like it works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothing producer noticed this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and so forth) get stuck within the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the constant and intense rolling of the tires signifies that numerous the debris will likely be hurled off. No human can create that sort of physical force to continually pressure the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The way in which that the grooves are designed it only makes the soles onerous to scrub. It implies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots will be crammed up with debris and wouldn't help much in serving to the wearer to effectively climb; that is that if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are actually meant to allow the wearer to climb. It seems to me that if the soles are product of rubber there isn’t a need for such elaborately designed grooves that only gather dirt. I'm wondering why there aren’t chemists and clothes technicians working on a greater type of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips higher on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking sneakers are used, and it will make it unnecessary to make grooves on the soles of sneakers. I have seen some unusual designs that do not contribute to operate. It appears to me that grooves are simply placed on the soles of footwear for trend functions. This goes for sneakers too. Lots of sneakers which can be good in design in different ways, have very impractically designed soles. As far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and different such kinds of pants, there are those which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are those with drawstrings. After all I'm not an expert in making shoes or shoe-soles and i could be unsuitable , but I am sufficient of an skilled in wearing sneakers meant for energetic lifestyles and I believe that a number of shoe manufacturers are focusing on the unsuitable thing. I'm wondering why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the back of the pants waist space. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I think it makes the drawstring much less effective and it defeats the aim of the drawstring. Underwear: I've been in stores comparable to Ok-Mart and Goal where there are a large variety of women’s underwear. It is tough to find the sort of briefs that the majority of our grandmothers used to put on, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my view. I want consolation, sturdiness and straightforward-care. All that doesn't communicate for me. Something that will get caught you-know-where is unacceptable. I've been in the underwear section of department stores and different shops (I must admit I never seemed in Victoria’s Secret but I don’t expect to find something sensible there), and I've seen older women trying to find something that is age-applicable and dignified and , once more, practical. There may be little aside from these hello-cuts. See one of many links under for an article concerning the historical past of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” usually are not modest sufficient. It seems it has at all times been about physically limiting women. That’s the way in which I have a look at it. Also one of many links http://sport9sleggingz.bravesites.com/entries/general/pants-hiking-lady---bra-shorts under result in an article about how there might be a women’s like of clothes which can be impressed by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It signifies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I've found to what I want is a sure Jockey model temporary “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the better type of design to get. Elastic that is merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be much less rugged and the stitching can come undone extra simply . I have to order a measurement larger than I normally would so that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One major flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t perceive the actual goal of “athletic bras” the way they're designed. I positive don’t care about “standing out.” ( I actually don’t in any case, and i don’t care). Bras meant for active lifestyles ought to hold them in, nothing more. I've heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I've seen some female runners who appear to be prime heavy and still they are very fast however I'm wondering if they are going to develop again issues later in life. I know that I might not be addressing the wants of ladies born with certain sizes, or who have special wants such as after surgical procedure, however sport bras must be made to have enough comfortable tension to prevent bouncing. There's a necessity for bras that do what some jock straps are speculated to do. I would like to design shirts and vests with tension constructed into the right space that would make bras unnecessary. It could be great for warmer weather and for simplicity, so you don’t have to hassle with attaching a bra and then a shirt. Simply keep “them” from moving. Simply slip into your shirt (and different clothes ) and you can go out to walk , jog or whatever. Why isn’t there such a factor? I believe I mentioned in one in every of my earlier posts that Coolibar had a fairly good pant for ladies referred to as Solar Pant. I'm sure a whole lot of ladies would want such sorts of clothes. I then put in an elastic band to offer more tension for the reason that waist band can be a bit too large otherwise, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to alter the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which involved cutting into the back of the waistband area since the drawstring was sewn into that area. It is rather practical for plenty of actions. It isn't so lengthy that the hem drags on the ground. It isn't for very very popular weather however that may depend on your own ability to tolerate hot weather. It's of a cloth blend that's not like cotton. All pants should have pockets, however typically the best way the pockets are designed make them ineffective anyway. I discover it is a really individual thing. This is how most hiking pants ought to be designed. It's a teensy bit too dense for highly regarded weather very very similar to the unique Coolibar Sun Pant. It is meant for use with a belt but I find that I don’t want one to put on this pant. I found a pant on Cabela’s that is for males, however which suits nicely and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of many final two hyperlinks below). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight once you bend or transfer. After all not everyone has the identical figure as I do so others may need a distinct opinion. However in general this is a good kind of pant . In the event you do like it you need to write to the company and inform them to cling on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the entrance pockets are designed so as the openings are slits nearly fully parallel with the waist. I think they're going to discontinue it so that you might want to give it a try. The material stretches so it isn't as bad as if it had been with denims with these kinds of pockets. It is an impractical design and that i don’t know why clothes designers make pant pockets like this. With these sorts of pockets you need to maneuver your hands in a more unnatural means and even elevate the hem of your shirt to put your fingers in your front pants pockets. It has to be for style, nothing else. Pockets should be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is nice too. It's a good idea to have zippered pockets. Anyone who has ever gotten his/her open pocket caught on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too shut will know what I mean. However generally zippers could cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you put your hands in. There is a must design zippers of non-scraping materials for this objective. There can also be another men’s pant from Columbia. I think I mentioned them before (see considered one of the 2 hyperlinks under). Why aren’t any clothing designers working on this? They are of a great materials for hot days, but for me, I discovered myself eradicating the belt and sewing an elastic band within the back of the waistband space so as to make the belt unnecessary. I ride a bike. I hardly ever use shorts even when i jog. But again, I must settle for no matter comes close to what I need. I came across a operating quick referred to as Brooks Sherpa IV. I tend to only go to clothing stores to take a look at designs and materials . What I did like about it was the lightweight materials. I just puzzled why regular lengthy pants usually are not made of such a material. It can be excellent for a hiking pant meant for extremely popular weather. The material was very much like a very very lightweight softshell. There is one from the North Face called The Prolix jacket. I love softshell clothes. It is rather lightweight, not excellent for cold weather by itself however you'll be able to put layering underneath it. It is flexible and suits excellently and allows freedom of movement. However softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer season. Additionally , why aren’t there any actually actually virtually-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make a terrific summertime softshell. There must be a vest for touring. I find myself wishing for such a thing. It does not exist. Why not make certainly one of lightweight and stretchy material? I know that I've stated to much in this put up. I'll stop for now. I hope I did not bore anyone. I've a whole lot of ideas for the better design of clothing
